Is Google Considering Contextual Links As A Ranking Factor?

Examine what has been written regarding contextual links as a ranking component to discover whether there is any proof to back up such statements.
Inbound links are a ranking indication that Google weights differently depending on the context.

The environment in which a high-value link occurs is one of the major characteristics that experts believe can distinguish it from a low-value connection.

A link embedded into relevant material is regarded to have a stronger influence on rankings than a link added randomly within irrelevant text.

Is there any truth to such assertion?

Let’s take a closer look at what’s been claimed regarding contextual connections as a ranking factor to determine if those statements are supported by research.

Contextual Links Are A Ranking Factor, According To The Claim
An inbound link that points to a URL that is relevant to the material in which the link occurs is referred to as a “contextual link.”

A contextual link is one in which an article refers to a source in order to offer further context to the reader.

Instead of being a hindrance, contextual connections bring value.
They should blend seamlessly with the text and provide hints about the page to which the reader is being led.

A contextual link is characterised by the surrounding text, as opposed to anchor text, which refers to the clickable component of a link.

Although the anchor text of a link may be connected to the webpage to which it points, it does not qualify as a contextual link if it is surrounded by material that is otherwise unrelated.

Contextual links are supposed to be a Google ranking component, with assertions that they are weighted greater than other forms of links by the search engine.

One of the reasons Google may be concerned with context when it comes to links is the user experience it provides.

It’s preferable for a user to click a link and land on a page that’s similar to what they were looking at before than to be routed to a website that they’re not interested in.

SEO Consultant recommendations all encourage collecting connections from relevant URLs rather than going out and planting links anywhere they would go.

When it comes to link building, there is now a larger emphasis on quality over number, and a link is regarded higher quality when its placement makes sense in context.

In principle, a single high-quality contextual link is worth more than numerous lower-quality connections.

That’s why experts recommend that site owners obtain at least a few relevant connections, rather than dozens of random links.

Google’s crawlers can read websites and judge how closely they connect to other URLs on the web if they weight the quality of links higher or lower based on context.

Is there any proof to back this up?